[Re] On the coexistence of specialists and generalists
A Julia replication about coexistence of ecological specialists and generalists in a discrete-time model.
External publication. Published by its original venue; not published in our journal.
How does a prespecified coexistence criterion vary across a registered parameter grid and initial-condition set?
An evaluator independently applies the recurrence and checks fixed-point residuals and nonnegative states; model coexistence does not verify field biodiversity.
What you could produce
- Versioned protocol, input and environment manifest, and independent per-case comparison table including uncertainty and incomplete cases.
Before you use it
- Exact article-specific dependencies, data and build requirements remain uninspected.
Limits to keep in view
- No research code was executed; no independent scientific verification has been performed.
- The current qualified pilot is self-contained Python 3.13 with a 90-second author deadline. This article's environment has not been qualified for that path.
- Published source metadata and a historical review do not establish compatibility, successful reproduction, operator independence or current scientific correctness.
- The language/runtime named by the upstream source is outside the current qualified Python-only pilot.
Source and permission context
Poisot, Timothée. [Re] On the coexistence of specialists and generalists. ReScience 4(1), #7; 10.5281/zenodo.1402676.
Catalog listing reviewed. This review covers the description and source links displayed here.
Poisot: recorded CC-BY-SA Zenodo-deposit evidence; current CC-BY article and MIT code observations are separately scoped/version-unmatched.
Reviewed 2026-09-14. Copying or adapting source files remains subject to their own terms.
manuscript · No SPDX identifier
The publisher's current policy applies Creative Commons Attribution to its published articles; the policy alone does not specify the license edition.
Inspect the license evidence ↗archived deposit · CC-BY-SA-4.0
This exact Zenodo deposit declares CC-BY-SA-4.0. The journal's general manuscript CC BY policy is a separate, conflicting observation; archive contents were not inspected.
Inspect the license evidence ↗code current repository · MIT
The current repository's code/LICENSE.md contains MIT terms. This is code-subdirectory evidence, separately scoped from article and deposit rights, and not an established match to archived bytes.
Inspect the license evidence ↗manuscript current repository · CC-BY-4.0
The current article subdirectory contains CC BY 4.0 terms. The exact Zenodo deposit instead declares CC-BY-SA-4.0; correspondence between these current repository files and the archived deposit was not established.
Inspect the license evidence ↗Before copying source material
- Data licenses, permissions, consent restrictions and redistribution conditions have not been independently checked.
- Artifacts are referenced only; PDF/archive contents, dependency locks and bytes have not been inspected or executed.
- Zenodo's declared record license (cc-by-sa-4.0) requires reconciliation with the journal's manuscript CC BY policy; no artifact-specific conclusion is inferred.
- Current repository license files were inspected, but their equivalence to the journal's DOI/SWH artifact version and all third-party notices remain unresolved.