[Re] A Neurodynamical Model for Working Memory
A replication of a neurodynamical working-memory model using recurrent or echo-state networks.
External publication. Published by its original venue; not published in our journal.
How does recall error vary with delay length under fixed input and noise schedules?
Evaluator-owned target sequences and delay definitions permit independent recall scoring and an explicit no-memory baseline.
What you could produce
- Versioned protocol, input and environment manifest, and independent per-case comparison table including uncertainty and incomplete cases.
Before you use it
- Exact article-specific dependencies, data and build requirements remain uninspected.
Limits to keep in view
- No research code was executed; no independent scientific verification has been performed.
- The current qualified pilot is self-contained Python 3.13 with a 90-second author deadline. This article's environment has not been qualified for that path.
- Published source metadata and a historical review do not establish compatibility, successful reproduction, operator independence or current scientific correctness.
Source and permission context
Boraud, Theophile; Strock, Anthony. [Re] A Neurodynamical Model for Working Memory. ReScience C 7(1), #1; 10.5281/zenodo.4655870.
Rights need review. Review the scope and upstream conditions before reuse.
manuscript · CC-BY-4.0
The exact Zenodo record cited by the journal declares cc-by-4.0; the journal separately identifies published manuscripts as CC BY. This records manuscript rights, not separate code/data licenses or archive contents.
Inspect the license evidence ↗Still unresolved
- The associated code's exact license and version-specific third-party notices have not been independently checked.
- Data licenses, permissions, consent restrictions and redistribution conditions have not been independently checked.
- Artifacts are referenced only; PDF/archive contents, dependency locks and bytes have not been inspected or executed.